law92

Clarence Thomas urges Supreme Court to reexamine the issue of contraception The outrage over the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade however attacked by a former law clerk. He claimed that the significance of legal precedent seldom acknowledged. These justices of the Supreme Court frequently state that they will follow precedent. The outrage over the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was attacked by a former law clerk Clarence Thomas for Justice Neil Gorsuch. He claimed that the significance of legal precedent is seldom acknowledged. These justices of the Supreme Court frequently state that they will follow precedent. Additionally, determining whether a precedent is valid is part of the law of precedent. The